Sunday, January 22, 2023
HomeTeslaDebunking anti-EV myths, half 4: Sure, there shall be loads of energy...

Debunking anti-EV myths, half 4: Sure, there shall be loads of energy fo

Posted on
December 08, 2022
Charles Morris

The concept {the electrical} grid gained’t be capable to deal with the approaching inflow of EVs is a perennial subject for EV skeptics. Recently we’ve been seeing a wave of FUD that focuses on electrical vehicles. A charging hub for electrical vehicles would require as a lot electrical energy as “a small city,” or “a sports activities stadium,” they warn us. Sure, it should. However in actual fact, small cities do appear to get the ability they want—not less than within the wealthy world, brownouts and blackouts are uncommon besides in pure disasters. And I don’t recall anybody ever objecting to constructing a brand new sports activities stadium due to considerations that it will “crash the grid.” 

Above: A Tesla Semi heavy-duty electrical hauling truck. Photograph: Tesla

That is another instance of a favourite FUDster gadget: take a respectable concern with a brand new know-how, and amplify it right into a purpose to desert the brand new know-how—ignoring the truth that firms are busily devising methods to resolve the issues (and creating wealth within the course of).

It’s true that fleets of professional quality EVs would require huge quantities of vitality—however that’s a possibility, not a deal-killer.

Many fleet operators, having run years-long pilots with a number of electrical vehicles, and located that they work nice, now need to place bigger orders—however they quickly study that they’re going to wish to make massive investments in charging infrastructure, and that they don’t have the experience to arrange these techniques. Automobile OEMs and startup firms are seizing this chance, providing “turnkey” infrastructure packages to fleet operators. The charging techniques they design embody a number of options designed to maintain vitality calls for cheap, together with sensible charging; load administration; on-site vitality technology and battery storage.

Let’s say you’ve gotten a fleet of 100 electrical Class 8 vehicles, every with an enormous 900 kWh battery pack (the estimated battery capability of a Tesla Semi). Does that imply that the vehicles are going to attract 90,000 kW of energy per hour? Nicely, it’d in the event you simply plugged all of them immediately into the grid, however no fleet operator with any sense would achieve this.

A savvy fleet operator goes to plug these beasts into an vitality administration system (which can be offered by an electrical car OEM similar to Proterra, or by a third-party firm similar to AMP or The Mobility Home) that’s been fastidiously designed to optimize vitality utilization whereas preserving the vehicles or buses charged and prepared for his or her routes. Sensible charging means scheduling charging to happen at instances of low demand on the grid. Load administration means limiting the ability stage to every particular person car in order that the general electrical load doesn’t stress the grid connection. On-site photo voltaic panels and/or wind generators generate a part of the vitality required, and large stationary battery packs (maybe constituted of second-life EV batteries) retailer that vitality so it may be used at optimum instances.

Including up the results of all these energy-saving applied sciences, we discover that the present required to maintain our fleet charged is a fraction of the “nameplate” vitality capability of our autos’ batteries. As an alternative of drawing 90,000 kW of energy, we’d solely want 60,000 kW.

Shifting as much as the macro stage, we discover that the fossil gasoline ecosystem additionally consumes a whole lot of electrical energy—one current research estimates that, when you think about oil drilling, refining, transportation, and many others, a fuel or diesel truck is liable for half as a lot electrical energy consumption as an EV (along with the vitality it makes use of within the type of fossil gasoline). So, each EV that replaces a diesel truck will increase web electrical energy consumption by solely a fraction of the quantity that it immediately consumes.

These public-spirited people who “don’t have anything towards EVs, however…” invariably assume that each electrical truck or bus goes to cost from zero to 100% of its nameplate battery capability daily, and that their house owners are merely going to plug all of them into the wall, heedless of the vitality prices. The truth is, fleet operators have each incentive to spend money on know-how to attenuate their vitality consumption, and that know-how is getting an increasing number of highly effective by the day.

One other issue is that EVs ship substantial financial savings on gasoline prices and upkeep. Over time, this greater than offsets the funding a fleet must make in charging infrastructure. And we haven’t even talked about vehicle-to-grid know-how, which is predicted so as to add to the financial savings EVs ship to fleets, whereas turning them into belongings—not liabilities—for the soundness of the grid.

Once we think about the vitality financial savings on the micro and macro ranges collectively, we discover that the vitality consumption of a fleet of EVs is sure to be far decrease than indicated by a simple-minded equation of battery capability * variety of autos = grid goes kablooey!


This text is one among a four-part (and rising) sequence about politely debunking anti-EV myths:

1 – Helpful hyperlinks to debunk frequent anti-EV myths

2 – Debunking frequent anti-EV myths, half two: accountable sourcing of uncooked supplies

3 – Favourite rhetorical instruments used to unfold anti-EV misinformation

4 – Sure, there shall be loads of energy for electrical vehicles

And for many who don’t care about being well mannered:

Snarky solutions to silly EV questions

Posted in

Electrical Vans,

Electrical Automobiles,

EV Charging,

Tesla Semi




Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Most Popular

Recent Comments